Category: Uncategorized

Drax Power Station has become a symbol of the UK’s determination to lead the global energy transition. Once a coal giant, Drax has reinvented itself as one of the world’s largest biomass power stations, today providing around 6% of Britain’s electricity. For policymakers, investors, and communities alike, Drax is more than a power plant – it is a living example of industrial transformation.

---

From Coal to Clean Power

Drax’s journey reflects the speed and scale of the UK’s energy transition. Over the last decade, the plant has moved away from coal and embraced sustainable biomass, helping the UK achieve one of the fastest reductions in coal use among advanced economies. This shift has cut millions of tonnes of CO₂, supported the phase-out of coal by 2024, and kept the lights on during periods of low wind or solar output.

---

BECCS: Turning Biomass into Negative Emissions

The next chapter in Drax’s story is Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). By combining biomass combustion with advanced carbon capture technology, Drax aims to remove up to 8 million tonnes of CO₂ per year from the atmosphere by 2030. This would make the facility one of the world’s first large-scale carbon-negative power stations – a goal fully aligned with the UK’s legally binding net-zero targets.

---

Jobs, Communities, and Innovation

Drax is not just an energy provider; it is an economic anchor. Thousands of jobs depend on its operations, both directly at the plant and across the wider supply chain, from forestry to logistics. By pioneering BECCS, Drax also invests in skills, innovation, and industrial know-how that could become an export strength for the UK.

---

Addressing Sustainability

Critics have raised concerns about sourcing, but Drax has implemented one of the most comprehensive sustainability frameworks in the industry:

• Independent certification schemes ensure responsible forest management.
• Residue-based sourcing is prioritized, reducing pressure on primary forests.
• Full transparency through detailed supply chain reporting builds trust.

With continuous improvement and regulatory alignment, Drax is proving that large-scale biomass can be both sustainable and reliable.

---

The Bigger Picture

At a time when energy security and climate action are both pressing priorities, Drax demonstrates that legacy infrastructure can be transformed into a tool for decarbonisation. Its model – coal-to-biomass conversion, followed by BECCS – is now studied worldwide as a pathway for other countries.

---

“We have the potential to make Britain a world leader in carbon-negative energy – delivering clean power, negative emissions, and economic growth at the same time.”
(Drax Group, 2023)

---

Sources

• Drax Group – BECCS Vision
• UK Biomass Strategy 2023
• Bioenergy Europe – Sustainability Criteria

Wood pellets have become a symbol of both the promise and the controversy of biomass. They are compact, tradeable, and – under most policy regimes – counted as renewable energy. Since the early 2000s, pellets have grown into a global commodity, connecting forests in North America and Southeast Asia to power stations in Europe and Japan.

The Bioenergy Europe Statistical Report 2024 (SR24) shows a market at a turning point: global production rose in 2023 by 2.6% to 48.8 million tonnes, while consumption actually fell by 0.9% to 44.4 million tonnesSR24_Pellets_FullVersion699. For the first time in years, production and demand moved in different directions – exposing structural weaknesses.

---

Production Trends: A Shifting Geography

The EU27 remains the largest producer, with 20.6 Mt in 2023, but output dropped by -1.8%SR24_Pellets_FullVersion699. This reflects declining domestic demand as subsidies are cut and sustainability rules tighten.

By contrast, Vietnam surged ahead: production jumped +77% to ~4.6 Mt, overtaking Canada and making Vietnam the third-largest exporter worldwideSR24_Pellets_FullVersion699. Japan (51%) and South Korea (47%) absorbed almost all of these exports.

North America (U.S. and Canada) remains stable at 14.3 Mt, but with diverging dynamics: the U.S. expanded exports to Europe (9.5 Mt), while Canada lost market share (-6.6%) after sustainability concerns in British Columbia triggered NGO campaigns.

Meanwhile, Russia suffered a collapse: sanctions and market isolation cut production by ~30%, removing nearly 3 Mt from global supply.

---

Consumption Patterns: Europe Declines, Asia Rises

Europe still dominates consumption, but cracks are visible:

• EU27: 22.0 Mt (-3.3%) in 2023. The decline was sharpest in power generation, as countries like the Netherlands and Denmark cut industrial use. Heating markets (Italy, Germany, France) remained stable.
• Other Europe (UK, Switzerland, etc.): 8.1 Mt (-11.7%), largely because Drax and Lynemouth burned fewer pellets.
• Asia: the growth engine. Japan increased consumption by +32% to 6 Mt, South Korea stayed stable at ~4.7 Mt, and smaller markets (e.g., Taiwan) emerged. Together, Asia consumed 10.7 Mt – a record.
• North America: 2.2 Mt, mostly residential heating, with little growth potential.

This shift signals a profound rebalancing: Asia may soon overtake Europe as the largest pellet consumer.

---

Policy Drivers: The Silent Hand Behind the Market

Pellet markets are not driven by technology, but by policy frameworks.

1. EU RED III: With Directive (EU) 2023/2413, Brussels excluded primary forests and peatlands from subsidies and tightened carbon accounting. This shrinks demand for imported industrial pellets.
2. UK Contract for Difference (CfD) scheme: Less favorable economics in 2023 reduced burn at major power stations.
3. Japan’s Feed-in Tariff (FIT): Still guarantees a strong pellet import market, making Japan the new #2 global consumer.
4. South Korea’s REC system: Once generous, now unstable. The 2023 subsidy cut has frozen new demand growth.
5. Sanctions on Russia: Removed a major supplier, reshaping global trade flows.

---

Implications for the Energy Transition

Pellets play a paradoxical role in the energy transition:

• Dispatchable renewable power: Unlike wind and solar, pellets can deliver baseload or peak power. This is crucial for grid stability – but comes at the cost of higher emissions per MWh.
• Carbon neutrality debate: Pellets are officially counted as carbon neutral in most frameworks, but this rests on the assumption of regrowth. Critics argue that burning now and regrowing later undermines 2030 climate targets.
• Investment risks: With oversupply, declining EU demand, and reputational risks, investors must reassess whether pellet plants are stranded assets in waiting.
• Geopolitics: The rise of Vietnam shows how demand shifts can rapidly create new supply chains. But reliance on imports raises questions of energy security and sustainability certification.

For policymakers, pellets are both a bridge (supporting renewables integration) and a trap (risking lock-in of contested biomass).

---

Outlook

• Short-term (2024–2025): Oversupply will pressure prices, especially in Europe. Smaller producers may exit the market.
• Medium-term (2026–2030): Asia will consolidate as the demand center, with Japan and South Korea dictating trade flows.
• Long-term (post-2030): Only pellets from residues and wastes, certified under strict sustainability standards, will remain politically legitimate. Large-scale forest pellet imports are unlikely to survive beyond 2035.

The pellet sector thus embodies the dilemma of the energy transition: it provides immediate dispatchable power, but its political future depends on whether it can prove itself as truly sustainable – not just “renewable on paper.”

---

Sources

• Bioenergy Europe Statistical Report 2024
• EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED III)
• Biomasspolicy.com – Pellet Market Coverage

Pelleting is a key process in the production of biomass fuel, where raw materials like wood, agricultural residues, or other organic matter are compressed into small, dense pellets. This process involves grinding the raw materials into a fine powder, conditioning them with steam or moisture, and then pressing them through a die to form uniform pellets. The goal of pelleting is to create a fuel source that is easy to handle, transport, and burn efficiently, providing a consistent energy output.

In the quest for more sustainable biomass sources, palm kernel shells and other agricultural by-products are gaining attention. Palm kernel shells, a by-product of palm oil production, offer a renewable and abundant source of biomass. Utilizing such residues not only provides an alternative to traditional wood pellets but also helps reduce waste and the environmental impact of palm oil production.

In a significant policy shift, South Korea announced it will end subsidies for new biomass energy projects and state-owned coal-biomass power plants starting January 2025. This move, described by the environmental nonprofit Solutions for Our Climate (SFOC) as the largest biomass policy rollback in Asia, aims to address environmental criticisms regarding biomass fuel’s carbon footprint and deforestation impacts.

Currently, South Korea is a major importer of forest biomass, notably wood pellets, which has fueled deforestation concerns in Southeast Asia. While subsidies for domestically sourced biomass remain, the reduction in support for imports is expected to alleviate some pressure on these forests.

Previously, South Korea provided substantial renewable energy credits (RECs) for biomass power, amounting to $688 million in subsidies for just one year. The revised policy will phase out RECs for imported wood pellets and eliminate support for certain state-owned biomass plants by 2025.

While domestic biomass will still receive subsidies, critics warn of ongoing risks to local forests. The policy change is seen as a positive step but highlights the need for further action to protect global forests and address climate change concerns.

In Asia, Japan is anticipated to overtake South Korea as the largest wood pellet importer by 2030. Despite financial incentives being withdrawn for new projects, existing Japanese biomass initiatives still enjoy government support, stressing the ongoing environmental challenge posed by the biomass industry.

Forest advocates are hopeful that South Korea’s reforms can influence neighboring countries. However, the industry may seek new markets as South Korean and Japanese imports stabilize, leaving the environmental and climate issues unresolved.

Further infos.

We have seen decisions against the use of biomass in the Netherlands in the past. Now, Swedish government-owned energy group Vattenfall recently announced the cancellation of its long-standing plans to build a biomass heating plant in Diemen, near Amsterdam, Netherlands. The decision, made public on October 16, highlights growing concerns over biomass sustainability in the region.

The Netherlands has a number of biomass plants that utilize wood pellets, both for co-firing with coal and for heating purposes. The country has around 200 heat-producing biomass plants and four energy plants that co-fire with wood pellets and coal. Additionally, there are around 150 solid biomass projects dedicated to heat production.

In terms of consumption, the Netherlands uses around 3.1 million metric tons (MMT) of wood pellets annually, with domestic production being significantly lower, around 350,000 metric tons. Most of the pellets are imported, with a large portion used for co-firing in power plants.

This biomass infrastructure plays a key role in the Dutch energy transition strategy, although recent policy shifts are placing stricter sustainability standards on biomass projects.

The Vattenfall project, which had been in development for several years, was initially set to provide 120 megawatts (MW) of renewable heat to surrounding municipalities using sustainably sourced wood pellets. In June 2019, Vattenfall reached agreements with local authorities to supply heat to these communities. By September of that year, environmental permits were secured, positioning the plant for potential development.

However, in June 2020, Vattenfall announced a delay in finalizing the project due to rising debates over biomass as a sustainable energy source. The company emphasized that a clear and robust sustainability framework from the Dutch government was crucial before moving forward. With the ongoing uncertainty surrounding biomass policy and its environmental impact, Vattenfall ultimately decided to cancel the project altogether.

This development underscores the challenges that biomass faces as part of the renewable energy mix, particularly in Europe, where discussions about long-term environmental sustainability are intensifying.

Sources:

Biomass Magazine

USDA

Globalwood

A recent article claims that the bankruptcy of Enviva is a sign of weakness for the whole wood pellet industry. I highly doubt that.

There are several arguments against the statement that Enviva’s recent bankruptcy filing is solely a sign of the industry’s volatility:

1. Environmental Concerns: One of the primary arguments against the notion that Enviva’s bankruptcy filing solely reflects industry volatility is the environmental impact of biomass production. Critics point out that biomass facilities emit significant amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants, which contribute to climate change and pose risks to human health. This suggests that Enviva’s financial troubles could also be attributed to growing awareness and regulation of environmental impacts associated with biomass production. However, mitigating fossil fuels with regrowing rawmaterials is a better option.
   
2. Financial Mismanagement: Another argument is that Enviva’s bankruptcy may be due to its own financial mismanagement rather than industry-wide volatility. Even within the energy sector, not all companies are equally affected by market fluctuations. Poor business decisions, misallocation of resources, or failure to adapt to changing market dynamics could have played a significant role in Enviva’s financial struggles.
   
   Especially industrial wood pellet producers have long-term contracts. This improves risk mitigation and financing. However, occurences with global effect, such as the war in Ukraine, massivly impact fuel industries.
   
3. Overreliance on Subsidies: Enviva’s reliance on government subsidies indicates a level of dependency that may not be sustainable in the long term. The fact that biomass companies heavily rely on subsidies suggests underlying weaknesses in the business model that go beyond industry volatility. Changes in government policies or reductions in subsidies could significantly impact the financial viability of biomass producers like Enviva.
   
   Without subsidies, many innovations would be impossible. Therefore, a certain reliance on governmental aids is reasonable.
   
4. Environmental Justice Concerns: The argument against attributing Enviva’s bankruptcy solely to industry volatility also considers the broader social and environmental implications of biomass production. Issues such as environmental justice, highlighted by the creation of fugitive dust and its impact on communities living near biomass facilities, raise questions about the sustainability and ethics of biomass as an energy source. These concerns may have contributed to regulatory challenges or public opposition, further complicating the financial outlook for wood pellet producers.

Despite the challenges and criticisms facing the biomass industry, there are several arguments that underline its importance and strength of biomass:

1. Renewable Energy Source: Biomass is considered a renewable energy source because it comes from organic materials such as wood, agricultural residues, and municipal solid waste. Unlike fossil fuels, biomass can be replenished relatively quickly through natural processes, making it a valuable component of efforts to reduce dependence on non-renewable energy sources and mitigate climate change.
   
2. Carbon Neutrality Potential: While there are debates about the carbon neutrality of biomass, proponents argue that when managed sustainably, biomass can be carbon neutral or even carbon negative. The carbon emitted during combustion is offset by the carbon absorbed by newly planted vegetation, creating a closed carbon cycle. With proper forestry management practices and use of waste materials, biomass can contribute to reducing net carbon emissions.
   
3. Energy Security: Biomass can contribute to energy security by diversifying energy sources and reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels. Since biomass feedstocks are often locally available, biomass energy production can enhance energy independence and resilience, particularly in rural areas where other energy options may be limited.
   
4. Economic Benefits: The biomass industry supports jobs and economic development, particularly in rural communities where biomass resources are abundant. Biomass production, processing, and utilization create employment opportunities across various sectors, including forestry, agriculture, manufacturing, and energy production. Moreover, biomass energy projects can provide additional revenue streams for farmers, forest owners, and waste management facilities.
   
5. Waste Management: Biomass utilization helps address waste management challenges by converting organic waste materials into valuable energy products. By diverting organic waste from landfills and incineration, biomass energy production contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, minimizing environmental pollution, and promoting a circular economy.
   
6. Baseload and Dispatchable Power: Biomass power plants can provide baseload and dispatchable power, complementing intermittent renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Biomass facilities can ramp up or down quickly in response to fluctuating energy demand, enhancing grid stability and reliability.
   
7. Technological Innovation: Ongoing research and development efforts are driving technological innovation in the biomass industry, leading to improvements in efficiency, environmental performance, and cost-effectiveness. Advanced biomass conversion technologies, such as gasification, pyrolysis, and biofuels production, hold promise for further expanding the range of biomass applications and enhancing its competitiveness compared to conventional fossil fuels.

Overall, while acknowledging the challenges and environmental concerns associated with biomass production, these arguments emphasize the important role biomass plays in the transition to a more sustainable and resilient energy system.

In the realm of global climate policies, the European Union (EU) stands out for its meticulously crafted strategies. Yet, amidst this sophistication, the intricacies of certain aspects, such as the “zero-emissions” factor in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) for sustainable wood-based biomass, often lead to widespread misconceptions.

Commonly referred to as “zero-rating,” this policy does not imply that emissions from wood-based biomass are disregarded. Instead, the EU-ETS assigns a zero-emissions rating to wood-based biomass because its emissions are already factored into the Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector, accounting for changes in forest carbon stocks.

Diving into the rationale behind this approach, the first key consideration is the avoidance of double counting. By registering wood-based biomass emissions in both the LULUCF sector and the energy sector, a scenario of double counting would emerge.

Furthermore, allocating emissions to the LULUCF sector proves more accurate. The diverse origins of wood-based biomass used in energy create challenges in precise accounting within the energy sector. Contrasting a recently harvested forest residue with post-consumer wood harvested decades earlier illustrates the complexity. The LULUCF sector’s annual change in carbon stocks covers all emissions without requiring intricate ex-post adjustments.

Thirdly, international bodies such as the IEA, IPCC, and EU Commission advocate for increased use of modern bioenergy to achieve net-zero targets. Imposing a price on wood-based biomass in the energy sector could act as a disincentive, hindering climate goals and favoring fossil fuels.

Importantly, the EU’s decision to account for wood-based biomass in the LULUCF sector aligns with international standards, as highlighted by the EU Commission’s Joint Research Centre. This approach mirrors guidelines set by the IPCC and UNFCCC for national GHG inventories and the Paris Agreement’s accounting principles.

Greg Marland from Oak Ridge National Laboratory underscores the deliberate nature of this choice, emphasizing the IPCC’s comprehensive consideration of emissions from fossil fuels and changes in biological stocks of carbon.

The zero-rating is contingent on sustainable sourcing, ensuring stable or growing carbon stocks in forests. The Renewable Energy Directive places caps on supply chain emissions for installations using biomass within the EU-ETS. It mandates compliance with sustainability criteria, ensuring the regeneration of harvested areas, maintenance or improvement of long-term production capacity, and the implementation of proper accounting, laws, or management practices to preserve carbon stocks and sink levels.

In essence, the zero-rating for sustainable biomass in the EU-ETS is a logical, well-researched decision grounded in internationally accepted accounting methods. Beyond the environmental benefits, it serves as an economic incentive for forest owners to maintain forests as forests, steering us closer to a fossil-free future. Rejecting the zero-rating could lead to resource waste, make forested land less attractive to preserve, and impede progress toward a sustainable, fossil-free future.

#fossilfree #biomass #woodpellet #netzero

Sourced from Andrew Georgiou in Biomassa Feiten

In a world grappling with the urgent need for decarbonization, the harmful effects of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the environment have reached a tipping point. As we stand at the edge of profound climate shifts, the call for immediate action to transition to sustainable energy sources becomes increasingly imperative.

Understanding the Global Context

Recent reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasize the criticality of decarbonization to limit global warming and mitigate the impacts of climate change. The urgency has intensified, with 2023 marking a potential tipping point that could accelerate environmental changes.

Pellet Fuel as a Decarbonization Catalyst

Amidst the urgency, the search for practical, equitable solutions to power our societies has gained momentum. The transition away from fossil fuels necessitates “drop-in” replacements capable of sustaining our current infrastructure with minimal disruption. Pellet fuel, derived from (fast) regrowing biomass, emerges as a promising contender.

Building on existing initiatives in power, heat, and transport sectors, pellet fuel provides a unique solution to the variability challenges posed by wind and solar power. Its energy-dense composition, sourced from sustainably managed forests, makes it a viable carbon-beneficial replacement for coal in power generation. With torrefied pellets bringing further advantages to the table.

Pellet Fuel’s Role in Large-Scale Energy Storage

While the production fluctuations of renewable sources remains a concern, the potential of pellet fuel extends beyond mere substitution for basline power generation. As we grapple with the intermittency of wind and solar power, pellet fuel emerges as a bridge to the future. Large-scale energy storage solutions, often considered essential for a stable grid, find a powerful ally in the form of pellet fuel, delivering stored energy when needed. Other than batteries stooring electrical power, wood pellets store the capacity to produce heat and electricity at much lower cost. And while R&D in battery technologies is essential to cover the growing demand for electric power, pellets allow for immediate implementation as a Power-to-X approach.

Global Forest Management and Sustainable Practices

Ensuring the sustainability of pellet fuel hinges on responsible forest management. Collaborative efforts with international forestry organizations and policies supporting the responsible use of biomass are crucial. By adhering to sustainable practices, we can maximize the potential of managed, working forests as a continuous and renewable resource.

The Broader Landscape of Decarbonization

While pellet fuel plays a pivotal role, it is one piece of the larger puzzle of decarbonization. Integrated strategies involving renewable energy sources, energy efficiency measures, and advancements in carbon capture technologies are essential components of a comprehensive approach.

Pellet Fuel’s Impact on Global Energy Landscape

Statistics reveal a profound impact. In 2022, the global pellet fuel supply chain delivered the equivalent of a Panamax-size ship filled with stored energy every day of the year. This demonstrates not just the viability of pellet fuel but also its immediate potential in contributing to global decarbonization efforts. Sustainably managed forests and reforestation of wild fire areas ensure that sufficient biomass is available.

Towards a Sustainable Future

The journey towards decarbonization is complex, requiring multifaceted solutions. Pellet fuel’s ability to seamlessly integrate into existing infrastructure, coupled with its potential for large-scale energy storage, positions it as a vital asset in the global pursuit of a sustainable and low-carbon future. Advocating for policies that align with responsible biomass use ensures a harmonious transition, marking the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel era. As we collectively navigate this transformative period, pellet fuel stands as a beacon of hope, illuminating a path towards a cleaner, greener tomorrow.

References:

Biomass Magazine article by Bill Strauss

Bioenergy Europe article

Amidst the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war and the escalating energy crisis, the European Green Deal has emerged as a pivotal initiative with profound implications for large businesses. This ambitious plan, approved in late 2019, seeks to achieve climate neutrality in Europe by 2050 and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. In this blog post, we explore the latest data and figures that underscore the impact of the Green Deal on industries and corporations.

Europe’s Pursuit of Climate Neutrality
The Green Deal’s comprehensive approach encompasses eight key segments, addressing biodiversity, sustainable food systems, agriculture, industry and mobility, clean energy, construction and renovation, and pollution elimination. As of the latest available data, Europe remains committed to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent by 2050. The plan includes strategies for transitioning industries, promoting sustainable food production, and fostering combustion engine-free transportation.

Why Embrace the Green Deal?
The imperative is clear: the planet is not just seeking help; it is crying out for it. Greenhouse gases, central to the greenhouse effect, are contributing to global warming, glacier melting, and rising sea levels. The urgency to reduce carbon dioxide concentrations, currently at their highest levels in the last 650,000 years, is evident. Utilizing renewable energy sources and implementing energy conservation measures are crucial components of the Green Deal.

The Mission of the Green Deal
The Green Deal’s mission is to restore nature to a reasonably acceptable state. The latest data reveals that the concentration of carbon dioxide continues to rise, reinforcing the critical need for action. Achieving this involves adopting innovative technologies and sustainable practices, addressing issues such as excessive fossil fuel consumption, deforestation, intensive livestock farming, and the use of nitrogen-containing fertilizers.

Impact on Large European Businesses
For many businesses, the Green Deal poses significant challenges, necessitating substantial investments in new technologies and sustainable solutions. Current figures indicate increased administrative burdens for European exporters of goods and services. However, uncertainties persist among businesses regarding the feasibility of the goals outlined in the Green Deal, with some deeming them unrealistic. Against the backdrop of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war, critics argue that it has posed additional challenges to achieving the Green Deal’s objectives. Consequently, achieving EU energy self-sufficiency is now perceived as a pressing priority.

Conclusion
As Europe charts its course towards climate neutrality, the Green Deal stands as a transformative force with far-reaching implications for businesses and industries. The latest data underscores the urgency of embracing sustainable practices and innovative technologies to meet ambitious targets, contributing to a healthier planet for future generations.

France has decided to extend the operation of its last two coal-fired power plants until the end of 2024, as it anticipates increased demand during the winter months. Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne and Energy Transition Minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher signed a decree to this effect. While the country expects lower demand compared to the previous winter, they are taking precautions to ensure a reliable supply of French electricity.

During the previous winter, the French government reopened the Saint-Avold coal unit to reduce reliance on Russian energy and compensate for electricity shortages caused by damage to its nuclear reactor fleet. This was due to factors such as stress corrosion, which impacted the output of state-owned nuclear giant EDF, leaving just 30 of its 56 reactors operational.

Ongoing concerns about energy security have led to the extension of the operational life of the two remaining coal plants in Cordemais and Saint-Avold, beyond their initial closure dates. In 2017, President Emmanuel Macron pledged to close all of France’s coal-fired plants before 2022.

Agnès Pannier-Runacher has stated that the two coal units that will remain in operation contribute only 0.6% of the country’s total electricity consumption. The French government, however, remains committed to completely phasing out coal power by 2030 at the latest, a target that puts them ahead of some other European Union countries like Germany. Germany has indicated that a complete coal phase-out by 2030 is a best-case scenario, with 2038 being the worst-case scenario. Germany has also reactivated some coal-fired plants since 2021, which contradicts their previous commitment to phasing out coal by 2030.

Additionally, in March, the UK relied on reserve coal power to cope with increased demand at the end of a colder-than-expected winter, which is in conflict with their government’s target to phase out coal entirely by 2024.

A study by the NGO Global Energy Monitor published in April found that the retirement of operational coal power plants needs to accelerate significantly to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. It also stressed that OECD countries should completely phase out coal by 2030 to avoid the worst effects of the climate crisis.

However, transitioning coal-fired power plants to biomass can significantly improve base-load energy and heat from renewable energy sources. Drax, a vertically integrated energy producer, is a good example for the energy transition.

A recent report by the Energy Futures Initiative (EFI) has unveiled a comprehensive policy roadmap for the large-scale deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Titled “Taking Root: A Policy Blueprint for Responsible BECCS Development in the United States” the report highlights how BECCS can effectively contribute to decarbonization by permanently removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and accelerating the transition to a climate-friendly power grid. The report’s launch event in Washington D.C., hosted by the EFI Foundation and Resources for the Future, featured influential figures, including senators and energy experts, who emphasized the crucial role of BECCS in achieving global climate objectives.

The release of the EFI report marks a significant milestone in the development of BECCS policy, providing a comprehensive framework for its widespread implementation. By recognizing the unique potential of BECCS to deliver net-negative emissions on a large scale while ensuring a stable and economically viable energy supply, the report emphasizes the urgent need for a holistic policy approach. As policymakers and stakeholders explore the report’s recommendations, the deployment of BECCS stands poised to make a substantial impact on mitigating climate change, creating economic opportunities, and advancing sustainable environmental practices.

Renewable energy was the largest contributor to primary energy production in the European Union in 2021, accounting for 41% of the total energy produced. This trend has been consistent since 2016, when renewable energy surpassed nuclear energy as the primary source. Nuclear energy was the second-largest source, making up 31% of the total energy production, followed by solid fuels at 18%, natural gas at 6%, crude oil at 3%, and other sources at 0.2%.

Source

The distribution of primary energy production among EU member states varied greatly. Renewable energy sources were the sole contributor to primary energy production in Malta, while in other countries it represented the majority share. For instance, Latvia had a share of close to 100%, followed by Portugal at 98% and Cyprus at 96%. On the other hand, solid fuels were the dominant source of energy production in Poland, Estonia, and Czechia, with shares of 72%, 56%, and 45%, respectively.

The largest share of natural gas production was observed in the Netherlands at 58% and in Ireland at 42%, where it was accompanied by renewables and biofuels at 49%. In contrast, Denmark’s primary source of energy production was renewables and biofuels at 48%, while crude oil had the largest share at 35%.

The EU had to rely on imports from third countries to meet 58% of its energy consumption, making it necessary to consider imports alongside production when assessing the EU’s energy requirements.

Petroleum products, including crude oil, constituted the primary imported energy product, accounting for nearly two-thirds of the EU’s energy imports in 2021 (64%). This was followed by natural gas (25%) and solid fossil fuels (6%).

Read more

On April 4th, the Energy Council Ministerial Meeting between the EU and the US was held in Brussels to bolster cooperation in the energy sector. The Energy Council was chaired by EU High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell and Commissioner for Energy Kadri Simson, along with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US Deputy Secretary for Energy David Turk. The focus of the meeting was on energy security in Europe and neighboring regions, as well as joint efforts towards decarbonization.

During the meeting, the co-chairs discussed ways to ensure energy security while accelerating the transition to green energy. They addressed the situation in Ukraine and Moldova in the context of next winter’s outlook and deliberated on clean-energy technologies and energy savings to expedite decarbonization. Additionally, the two sides exchanged views on reducing methane emissions as initiators of the Global Methane Pledge.

In a joint statement, the EU and the US pledged to coordinate responses to maintain global energy markets’ stability and support the Paris Agreement’s goals. The statement also underscored the importance of reducing dependence on Russia for nuclear materials and fuel cycle services while backing affected EU countries’ efforts to diversify nuclear fuel supplies.

Following the meeting, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between the TotalEnergies Anomaly Detection Initiatives (TADI) of the Pôle d’Etudes et de Recherche de Lacq and the Colorado State University Methane Emission Technology Evaluation Center (METEC) to establish international standards for methane leak detection and quantification solutions.

The EU and the US are strategic partners working hand in hand to push for ambitious climate action, net zero emissions, and enhanced energy security while promoting energy diversification. The EU-US Energy Council is the principal framework for cooperation on mid and long-term issues, accompanied last year by the EU-US Task Force on Energy Security to tackle the energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Commission and the White House published a progress report on the Task Force’s work, outlining priorities for 2023.

For more information, look here.

The European Union has taken another step towards achieving its renewable energy goals with the provisional agreement reached between the European Parliament and the Council to reinforce the Renewable Energy Directive. This agreement strengthens the EU’s binding renewable energy target for 2030 to a minimum of 42.5%, up from the current 32% target, and almost doubling the existing share of renewable energy in the EU. The objective is to achieve 45% of renewables by 2030, demonstrating the EU’s commitment to gain energy independence and meet the EU’s 55% greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030.

The new law aims to make permitting procedures easier and faster, recognizing renewable energy as an overriding public interest while preserving a high level of environmental protection. Additionally, the agreement includes targets and measures to support the uptake of renewables across various sectors of the economy, including heating and cooling, district heating systems, and industry. For the first time, industry is included in the Renewable Energy Directive, with indicative targets and a binding target to reach 42% of renewable hydrogen in total hydrogen consumption in the industry by 2030. The agreement also reinforces the regulatory framework for renewable energy use in transport, including a sub-target of 5.5% for advanced biofuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin, supporting the EU’s ambitions on renewable hydrogen roll-out.

The agreement also strengthens the bioenergy sustainability criteria, ensuring that forest biomass is not sourced from certain areas with a particular importance from a biodiversity and carbon stock perspective. The revised Directive includes provisions to ensure that woody biomass is used according to its highest economic and environmental added value, and financial support is banned for energy produced through the use of certain types of biomass.

The European Green Deal is the EU’s long-term growth strategy to make Europe climate-neutral by 2050. The revision of the Renewable Energy Directive is one of the ‘Fit for 55’ proposals presented by the Commission in July 2021 to make the EU’s climate, energy, land use, transport, and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. The agreement brings the EU closer to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent by 2050 and achieving the REPowerEU Plan, which is the EU’s strategy to reduce its dependence on Russian fossil fuel imports as soon as possible. The new legislation will be published in the Official Journal of the Union and enter into force once it is formally adopted by the European Parliament and the Council.

Look here for more information.

Climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time, and reducing carbon emissions is crucial to addressing it. Fossil fuels have been the primary source of energy for a long time, but their use has led to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. As such, alternatives that can mitigate the carbon footprint of fossil fuels are being explored. One such alternative is wood pellets, which can be used as a substitute for fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas. In this article, we explore the role of wood pellets in carbon mitigation, their benefits, challenges, and how they can contribute to a sustainable energy future.

Introduction: The Need for Carbon Mitigation

The increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration resulting from human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels, is one of the primary drivers of climate change. Carbon mitigation is, therefore, a critical strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and limit the extent of global warming.

Carbon Mitigation is the process of reducing or offsetting GHG emissions to decrease the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. The goal of carbon mitigation is to limit the extent of global warming and its adverse impacts, including more frequent and severe weather events, rising sea levels, and biodiversity loss.

To achieve carbon mitigation, we need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, which are finite, non-renewable, and emit large amounts of CO2. Sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels, such as wood pellets, can play a crucial role in reducing GHG emissions and mitigating climate change.

The Role of Wood Pellets in Carbon Mitigation

Wood pellets are a type of biomass fuel made from compressed sawdust, shavings, and other wood residues. They are used as a renewable energy source in residential, commercial, and industrial applications.

Wood pellets have a lower carbon footprint compared to fossil fuels because they are made from renewable and sustainably managed forest resources. Moreover, the process of producing wood pellets is less carbon-intensive than the production of fossil fuels.

Using wood pellets as a fuel source can also help reduce GHG emissions by replacing fossil fuels in heating and electricity generation. In addition, the use of wood pellets promotes the circular economy by utilizing waste materials from the forest industry that would otherwise go to landfills.

Benefits of Substituting Fossil Fuels with Wood Pellets

The substitution of fossil fuels with wood pellets offers numerous benefits, including:

a) Reducing Carbon Emissions and Combating Climate Change: The use of wood pellets as a renewable energy source reduces GHG emissions and helps mitigate climate change. Replacing one ton of coal with wood pellets can reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 1.5 to 2.5 tons.

b) Cost-Effective and Sustainable Energy Solution: Wood pellets are a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, with stable prices and a low environmental impact. In addition, the use of wood pellets contributes to rural economic development by creating jobs in the forestry and biomass sectors.

c) Contributing to Local Economic Development: The production and use of wood pellets can help create local economic opportunities in rural areas by utilizing locally sourced biomass and providing employment in the forestry and biomass industries.

Challenges in Substituting Fossil Fuels with Wood Pellets

While the substitution of fossil fuels with wood pellets offers many benefits, there are also some challenges to consider, including:

a) Supply Chain and Logistics Challenges: The production and transportation of wood pellets require significant logistical efforts, including harvesting, transportation, and processing. The cost of these activities can be a barrier to widespread adoption of wood pellets as a fuel source.

b) Environmental and Social Concerns: The production and use of wood pellets can raise environmental and social concerns, such as deforestation, soil erosion, and loss of biodiversity. These issues need to be addressed through sustainable forest management practices and regulations.

c) Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: The success of wood pellet substitution depends on supportive policy and regulatory frameworks that promote sustainable forest management, incentivize the use of renewable energy, and reduce barriers to market entry.

Success Stories and Best Practices in Wood Pellet Substitution

There are several successful examples of wood pellet substitution, including:

a) The North American Experience with Wood Pellet Substitution: The United States and Canada have experienced significant growth in the use of wood pellets as a renewable energy source. This growth has been driven by incentives such as renewable energy targets, tax credits, and subsidies.

b) European Success Stories and Lessons Learned: Europe has been a leader in the use of wood pellets as a renewable energy source. Countries such as Sweden, Denmark, and Austria have successfully integrated wood pellets into their energy mix, with biomass accounting for a significant proportion of their energy production. The European experience highlights the importance of sustainable forest management, stakeholder engagement, and supportive policy and regulatory frameworks.

Best practices in wood pellet substitution include:

• Ensuring the sustainability of the forest resource by promoting responsible forest management practices.
• Engaging with stakeholders, including local communities, to address social and environmental concerns and ensure a socially responsible transition to renewable energy.
• Developing supportive policy and regulatory frameworks that incentivize the use of renewable energy, reduce barriers to market entry, and promote sustainable forest management.
• Encouraging innovation and investment in research and development to improve the efficiency of wood pellet production and increase the use of biomass in energy production.

Conclusion: The Future of Carbon Mitigation with Wood Pellets

Wood pellets have the potential to play a significant role in carbon mitigation by substituting fossil fuels with renewable and sustainably sourced biomass. While there are challenges to widespread adoption, such as supply chain and logistics challenges and environmental and social concerns, best practices and successful examples from North America and Europe provide valuable lessons.

The growing role of wood pellets in carbon mitigation presents opportunities for rural economic development, sustainable forest management, and a transition to a low-carbon economy. The future of carbon mitigation with wood pellets depends on supportive policy and regulatory frameworks, innovation and investment in research and development, and collaboration between stakeholders to address environmental and social concerns and ensure a socially responsible transition to renewable energy.

The European Union (EU) has a significant role in leading the worldwide shift towards addressing climate change. To achieve this goal, the EU needs a solid mandate for its climate foreign policy that takes into account the current multi-crisis situation. The EU can establish this mandate at the upcoming Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) meeting in February, which has the following objectives:

1. Establish global agreement on ending the use of fossil fuels, with the EU taking a leading role in implementing it domestically.
2. Mobilize EU and international finances to support countries affected by the global energy, food, and economic crisis.
3. Use EU industrial and trade policies, and diplomatic efforts, to encourage other major carbon emitters to speed up their own decarbonization efforts.

The EU has already taken a step in the right direction by calling for a worldwide coal phase-out at the 2021 FAC meeting, which paved the way for a global agreement on reducing the use of coal at the COP26 conference. The upcoming February FAC meeting must build on this success and maintain the EU’s leadership position in the transition to a green economy. This year’s climate diplomacy FAC will take place in a more complex environment due to the Russian war in Ukraine and the pressure on global energy and food markets.

The EU’s mandate at the FAC meeting should aim to:

• Encourage a full global commitment to phase out fossil fuels and accelerate the phase-out of coal.
• Push for reforms that increase access to finance for developing countries to transition to a green economy.
• Provide incentives for other major carbon emitters to hasten their own transitions through the use of industrial and trade policies.

By demonstrating its own commitment to the green transition, the EU can inspire a global consensus to end the use of fossil fuels. However, the EU’s recent efforts to replace Russian fossil fuel imports with alternative sources have tightened global gas markets and risk being misinterpreted as a return to coal. A clear mandate for the green transition would show the EU’s commitment to its own climate targets, demonstrate how it is phasing out fossil fuels, and aim to drive a global phase-out of fossil fuels.

The EU can also signal its support for climate-vulnerable countries by mobilizing transition and impact response finance for developing countries. This can be achieved by supporting innovative mechanisms and reforms to multilateral financial institutions that help these countries deal with the impacts of climate change and high debt levels. The EU can also promote Just Energy Transition Partnerships, mobilize finance for adaptation and loss and damage, and work towards broader financial system reforms.

By taking a new approach to diplomatic engagement with other major carbon emitters, the EU can encourage these countries to make their own commitments. The EU can lead by example by setting its own ambitious targets for 2035/2040 NDCs and use its Green Deal diplomacy to incentivize other major emitters to take action. The EU can maximize its diplomatic impact by working together with developing countries to overcome political and economic hurdles.

In 2023, the EU should set the following key targets for its climate and energy diplomacy:

• A global fossil fuel phase-out mandate and progress towards phasing out coal globally.
• Financing for the global transition to a green economy and responding to the impacts of climate change.

Original article

European countries have been increasingly adopting renewable energy policies to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and combat climate change. Among the renewable energy sources, biomass has gained significant attention, particularly in Germany, the Netherlands, and France.

Germany has been a leader in the production and consumption of biomass. The country has a well-established wood processing industry, which provides a solid base for the production of wood chips and pellets, which are used as biofuels. The German government has implemented various policies to support the growth of the biomass sector, including tax incentives and subsidies for the production and use of biomass. Additionally, Germany has set a target to increase its renewable energy share to 80% by 2050, with a significant portion of this target being met through the use of biomass.

The Netherlands, like Germany, has a strong wood processing industry and is a leading producer of wood pellets. The government has implemented policies aimed at increasing the use of biomass in the country, including tax incentives and subsidies for the production and use of biomass. The Netherlands has set a target to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 49% by 2030, with the use of biomass playing a crucial role in achieving this target.

France has also been actively promoting the use of biomass as a source of renewable energy. The government has implemented various measures to support the growth of the biomass sector, including subsidies for the production and use of biomass. France has set a target to increase its share of renewable energy to 40% by 2030, with the use of biomass expected to play a significant role in achieving this target.

In conclusion, Germany, the Netherlands, and France are among the leading European countries in the promotion and adoption of biomass as a source of renewable energy. The governments of these countries have implemented various policies aimed at supporting the growth of the biomass sector, with the aim of reducing their dependence on fossil fuels and achieving their renewable energy targets.

The revision of a German program to encourage the production of power from renewable energy sources has been authorized by the European Commission in accordance with EU State Aid regulations. The program reflects a recent revision to Germany’s Renewable Energy Act (also known as “EEG 2023”) and will help the country meet its energy and environmental goals as well as the EU’s strategic goals for the European Green Deal.

Germany informed the Commission of its proposals to extend and change its renewable energy assistance program, largely replacing the current support provided under the EEG 2021 program, which the Commission approved in April 2021 (SA.57779) and updated in December 2021 (SA.64376) and September 2022. (SA.102303). The modified program will be in effect through the end of 2026.

With a total budget of €28 billion, the EEG 2023 support program seeks to produce 80% of the power it consumes from renewable sources by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045.

According to the plan, the assistance will often come in the form of a market premium that the network operator pays the producer in addition to the market price for the electricity. The aid will, however, come in the form of feed-in tariffs for relatively tiny installations. Through competitive, open, and nondiscriminatory bidding processes, beneficiaries will be chosen.

There will be separate tenders for each technology. The volume and quantity of innovative bids, as well as those for rooftop and ground-based solar photovoltaic, onshore wind, and biomethane, will both rise in Germany.

The amendments are:

To increase competition, further reduce the possibility of overcompensation, and keep costs down for customers and taxpayers, tender procedures are improved. In particular, the plan adds an efficient volume control mechanism for innovation, solar photovoltaic, and biomethane tenders on top of the existing safeguards for onshore wind and biomass. In order to prevent undersubscription, a mechanism exists that enables adjusting the volumes offered for each technology.

To deal with Germany’s grid congestion problems, a new temporary solution is presented. In order to address the higher costs of deploying renewable energy in the region and ensure that projects are developed where more electricity consumption occurs, regional measures will promote the development of electricity production from onshore wind, biomass, and biomethane in the South of Germany.

In order to avoid overcompensating producers, Germany will totally phase out its support for the production of renewable electricity during periods of negative pricing (i.e., when demand declines and prices rise) as of 1 January 2027.

The Commission evaluated the German program’s amendment in accordance with EU State Aid regulations, including the CEEAG 2022 Guidelines on State Aid for Climate, Environmental Protection, and Energy.

The European Commission’s findings:

In order to encourage the creation of renewable energy sources and lower greenhouse gas emissions, the plan is acceptable and required. Additionally, the plan improves grid stability.

The scheme’s good environmental advantages outweigh its negative implications in terms of competition distortions, making the aid appropriate since it is confined to the bare minimum required. In specifically, a premium based on the lowest bids in an open and transparent bidding process is used to provide the help. In order to guarantee that the tenders are competitive, the tenders also incorporate an adequate volume control mechanism for all technologies. Additionally, the assistance is capped at a sum determined by the funding gap, which is the sum required to construct initiatives. In the future, market signals will be less distorted because support during periods of low prices will be taken out.

Germany has created a comprehensive strategy for the independent economic evaluation of the EEG 2023 in accordance with the evaluation requirement envisioned by the CEEAG. Germany has also committed to improving data collection and the application of empirical methodology in this regard.

In accordance with EU State Aid regulations, the Commission accepted the change of the German plan on this basis.

Amendments to a German program (German Offshore Wind Energy Act – “WindSeeG”) to boost offshore wind energy generation in Germany have been authorized by the European Commission in accordance with EU State Aid regulations. The program supports the German Renewable Energy Act (Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz, or “EEG 2023”) and will help the EU achieve its strategic goals for the European Green Deal as well as Germany’s energy and environmental goals.

Germany informed the Commission of its intention to modify the current WindSeeG program in order to advance offshore wind energy production in Germany. The initial plan was approved by the Commission on July 23, 2014 (SA.38632), and it was repeatedly extended and changed until it was finally updated in 2021 (SA.57610), all in accordance with the 2014 Guidelines on State Aid for Climate, Environmental Protection, and Energy.

An increase in the expansion goals for offshore wind energy plants’ installed capacity from 20 GW to at least 30 GW by 2030, at least 40 GW by 2035, and at least 70 GW by 2040;

In the German Exclusive Economic Zone (‘EEZ’), there is a new tender process for a different kind of site that allows offshore wind electricity companies to bid for locations that have not been centrally pre-investigated by the German government. Germany hopes to accelerate and enhance offshore wind development with this new approach.

A dynamic bidding process that will enable Germany to distinguish and choose amongst numerous bids with a bid value of zero for tenders for non-centrally pre-investigated sites.

The Commission evaluated the modified plan in accordance with EU State Aid regulations, including the CEEAG Guidelines for State Aid for Climate, Environmental Protection, and Energy (effective January 2022).

In order to encourage the use of renewable energy sources and lower greenhouse gas emissions, the Commission determined that the measure is still necessary and appropriate.

The Commission also discovered that the assistance is reasonable and kept to a minimum. The Commission also concluded that the scheme’s benefits, particularly those related to the environment, outweigh any potential drawbacks in the form of competitive distortions. The aid is specifically given as a premium over the market price of power, based on the lowest offers in an open and transparent bidding process. The amount of assistance is capped at a level determined by the funding gap, which is the sum required to build initiatives.

Germany has created a comprehensive strategy for the independent economic evaluation of the program in accordance with the evaluation requirement envisioned by the CEEAG and has committed to improving data collection and the use of empirical approaches in this regard.

In accordance with EU State Aid regulations, the Commission approved the modified German program on this basis.

Based on two press releases by European Commission titled “State aid: Commission approves modification of German scheme to support electricity production from renewable energy sources” and “State aid: Commission approves amendments to German scheme to support offshore wind energy generation“ both of which were released on December 21, 2022