Future of Biomass Policy: Pathways to Net Zero by 2050

Biomass is more than a fuel – it’s a strategic political lever. While solar and wind attract attention, biomass sits at the nexus of climate ambition, industrial policy, and energy security. It can serve as a bridging resource in sectors that resist electrification, or as a backbone for negative emissions via BECCS (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage). Its fate, however, will be shaped not by technology alone but by policy, regulation, and supply chain integrity.

Europe: From Subsidies to Stringent Standards

With Directive (EU) 2023/2413 (RED III), the EU has recalibrated its stance. The directive phases out subsidies for forest biomass from primary or old-growth forests, imposes stricter chain-of-custody requirements, and mandates that government support schemes align with stronger sustainability and biodiversity safeguards. (EUR-Lex)

It decrees that Member States must ensure that “energy from biomass is produced in a way that minimises undue distortive effects on the biomass raw material market and adverse impacts on biodiversity, the environment and the climate.” (gov.ie)

Under RED III, new subsidies for electricity-only biomass plants (i.e. without combined heat) are banned, aligning incentives toward more efficient combined heat-power and BECCS configurations. (Energy)

To support compliance, certification schemes such as SBP (Sustainable Biomass Program) have issued bridging documents to map existing biomass standards onto RED III requirements. (Sustainable Biomass Program)

Thus, Europe is shifting from volume-based expansion toward quality-first governance. Countries like the Netherlands and Denmark are going further: revisiting large-scale pellet imports from North America to ensure alignment with stricter sustainability criteria.

United Kingdom: BECCS in the Spotlight

The UK Biomass Strategy 2023 emphasizes the role of biomass in decarbonizing “hard-to-electrify” sectors (aviation, heavy industry) and scaling BECCS as a tool for negative emissions. (biodieselmagazine.com)

However, translating this into practice is proving slower than planned. The deployment of Power BECCS is unlikely before 2030, and subsidy paths are under review. (GOV.UK)

Parliamentary scrutiny has flagged that earlier government targets for BECCS in 2030 are unlikely to be met, even as BECCS remains integral to the UK’s decarbonization assumptions. (Vereinigtes Königreich Parlament)

Yet, the UK is laying infrastructure groundwork: institutions and market design for carbon removal, potential integration with emissions trading, and frameworks to attract investment in BECCS and related technologies. (LSE)

Drax, as a key actor, has asserted that all major components of a BECCS system have already been demonstrated individually, making full deployment achievable by 2030. (Drax Global)

Interestingly, Drax is also expanding beyond the UK: plans to invest up to $12.5 billion in U.S.-based biomass + CCS projects suggest a global BECCS ambition. (Reuters)

United States & Canada: Incentivizing Growth

In the U.S., the biomass sector is buttressed by fiscal instruments such as the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and programs like BCAP (Biomass Crop Assistance Program). Meanwhile, critics question whether current practices fully account for supply-chain emissions. (ScienceDirect)

Canada, a major pellet exporter, is caught between lucrative European demand and growing public pressure around forest conservation and indigenous land rights. As Europe tightens biomass import rules, Canada’s ability to adapt will be critical.

Asia: Expansion Meets Policy Shifts

South Korea remains one of the briskest biomass markets, heavily dependent on imports from Vietnam, Indonesia, and Canada. But in 2023, the sudden termination of subsidies caused a market freeze and major disruption. (ieabioenergy.com)

China, meanwhile, is focusing more on agricultural residues (rice husks, straw) as an embedded part of rural development and circular bioeconomy strategies, reducing dependence on wood pellets.

Outlook: Biomass as a Strategic Lever

Biomass will matter more for policy choices than for inherent physics. The road ahead hinges on three dimensions:

• Policy & incentives: whether biomass is supported as niche or as a backbone to negative emissions architectures.
• Sustainability fidelity: how tightly definitions of “sustainable biomass” are enforced—this determines investment certainty.
• Supply chain resilience: global trade, forest governance, certification integrity, and geopolitical risk will remain key friction points.

Over the next half-decade, biomass could either become institutionalized in net-zero roadmaps — or recede into contested transitional fuel status.

“Biomass may appear as a small component, but its systemic impact is enormous: from extending asset lifetimes to enabling negative emissions, it wields political power beyond its energy share.”
(adapted from UK Biomass Strategy 2023)

---

Sources

• European Commission: Biomass & bioenergy overview (Energy)
• EU Directive 2023/2413 (RED III) text and provisions (EUR-Lex)
• Implementation of bioenergy in the EU (IEA Bioenergy / country report) (ieabioenergy.com)
• ControlUnion insight on RED III impacts (controlunion.com)
• Technical consultation on RED III Article 3(3) (biomass sustainability) (gov.ie)
• HFW analysis: forest biomass and RED III (HFW)
• Drax BECCS evidence / deployment arguments (Drax Global)
• LSE: carbon removal institutional readiness (UK) (LSE)
• Chatham House: BECCS critique and scaling challenges (Chatham House)
• UK Parliamentary report: BECCS delay / oversight (Vereinigtes Königreich Parlament)
• Reuters: Drax U.S. BECCS investment (Reuters)
• ControlUnion: stricter reporting & sub-targets under RED III (controlunion.com)